Place and time for the anti-halal demo: Feb. the 8th (Saturday) at 1 pm. Luxembourg Square (Place du Luxembourg), Brussels
Finishing time at 4 pm.
Finishing time at 4 pm.
PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ANDERS BEHRING BREVIK ADMITS HE WROTE HIS MANIFESTO IN ORDER TO DESTROY THE COUNTER-JIHAD MOVEMENT
SIOE blames those in the mainstream Western media who wallow in lying, duplicitous, propagandising and self-censorship for all the murders Breivik perpetrated and for all the deaths by violence, in the world. Such people see their role not one of disseminating unexpurgated truth, but one of manipulating public opinion. Innocent people die as a result.
Thankfully, this is not true for all the media, there are still some beacons of honest reporting. SIOE has experienced both the good, but unfortunately, mainly the bad.
With thanks to Robert Spencer Director of Jihad watch and Stop Islamisation Of America (SIOA)
Stop Islamisation Of Europe (SIOE) was founded in 2007 to stop and reverse the replacement of the European democratic system and law-making with Islam and Sharia law.
SIOE’s slogan is “Racism is the lowest form of stupidity; Islamophobia is the height of common sense.”
In an open letter to the media Anders Behring Breivik says that he used “counter-jihadist” rhetoric in the manifesto to protect “ethno-nationalists” and instead provoke a media campaign against the anti-nationalist counter-jihad supporters. He calls this a strategy of “dual psychology.”
Eighteen months before he committed his act of mass murder against innocent youngsters on Norway’s island of Utøya and other innocents in Oslo on 22 July 2011, SIOE rejected Breivik’s attempts to join SIOE’s Facebook group. Organisers were aware of Breivik’s Nazi sympathies.
SIOE organisers are convinced that Breivik committed his mass murder to specifically destroy SIOE due to SIOE’s overtly expressed anti-Nazism and anti-racism, and also for rejecting his advances to join SIOE. SIOE believes that his manifesto was written and his act of mass murder perpetrated to directly and uniquely target SIOE in order to eliminate its active presence in Europe.
Anders Breivik has now openly confessed as much.
In its many protests against encroaching Sharia and Islamic practices, SIOE has stated that any display of Nazi, communist and Islamic symbols would not be tolerated. On the single occasion when Nazis sneakily infiltrated one demonstration those Nazis were forcibly ejected from the protest, with police approval.
Each one of SIOE’s demonstrations has been peaceful, and fully approved by law enforcement authorities. Even when SIOE’s inaugural and eponymous demonstration on 11 September 2007 in Brussels was banned by Mayor Thielemanns, SIOE was permitted to hand in a 20,000 signature ‘Stop Islamisation’ petition to the EU Parliament, hold a conference and also to commemorate the 9/11 victims of Muslim terrorism.
SIOE’s refusal to permit Nazis made it popular with the public.
However, SIOE received open hostility from politicians such as British MP John Denham, who likened SIOE to Moseley’s fascists, despite our repeated, and truthful, anti-fascist assertions. The only violence displayed at any SIOE demonstration was from opposition groups such as Muslims, Unite Against Fascism and Antifa.
Breivik’s confession has now made our opponents look not only ridiculous, but also untruthful in their claims that Breivik was inspired by SIOE.
Most of the media were unhelpful because they distorted the facts, for example claiming Breivik was “an extreme Christian fundamentalist” even though he stated he was not even a practising Christian. Most of the media either censored or distorted SIOE’s ripostes and rebuffs of claims made in the same media, that Breivik had associations with, and was inspired by, SIOE. Breivik’s own confession proves that SIOE was telling the truth and our accusers in the media were lying.
So, Breivik was neither a SIOE supporter nor a practising Christian.
However, he was indisputably a Freemason. This makes him infinitely closer to senior police officers, senior military, gangsters, journalists and even Royalty, than he ever was to SIOE. Breivik maybe even shared a Masonic lodge with Norwegian Royalty and senior police officers.
Breivik allegedly visited the United Kingdom and was mentored by someone he called “Richard the Lionheart”. For all we know this man could have been the Duke of Edinburgh, the Queen’s husband, or Britain’s most senior Freemason, the Duke of Kent, cousin to the Queen. True, this is highly improbable, but no more absurd than Breivik being inspired by SIOE.
In fact Breivik was so uninspired by SIOE he uniquely tried to destroy SIOE.
Breivik also professed membership of the Order of the Venerable Order of St. John which, if true, again brings him into contact with Royalty because Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II is at the apex of the Order.
Maybe Freemasons and the Venerable Order of St John should be as scrupulous as SIOE in vetting its potential members so as to more protect its high profile members?
Interestingly, Nelson Mandela, now revered as a demigod, was also convicted for offences concerned with violence directed at his own government. Mandela was also a Freemason and member of the Venerable Order of St John. We can only wait to see if Breivik eventually comes to be as honoured and revered as Nelson Mandela. Both, it seems, were motivated by race, something SIOE evidentially is not.
SIOE is in no doubt that Freemasons and the Venerable Order of St John are as dismayed and angered at being associated with Anders Breivik as SIOE was, and still is, with the smearing of it by some unscrupulous parts of the Western mainstream media.
SIOE is delighted at being exonerated at last.
PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
APPLICATION FOR A PROHIBITORY COURT INJUNCTION TO BE SERVED AGAINST THE MUSLIM ACADEMIC TRUST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A MEGA-MOSQUE, ISLAMIC TEACHING FACILITY WITH MUSLIM DWELLINGS IN MILL ROAD, CAMBRIDGE
The application is to be heard in Cambridge County Court at 10.00am on 17th January 2014 by His Honour the District Judge Underwood.
The application was madeby Miss Sareeta Webra and who is being assisted by Stephen Gash.
When requested, copies of documents will be forwarded as attachments to emails as pdf documents. Such documents include detailed reasoning and examples which are summarised below.
The application has been made broadly for the following reasons:-
Therefore, mosque construction must be halted until Prime Minister David Cameron’s proposed legalisation of sharia-based finance in the UK, including the first sharia finance bond outside of a Muslim country, is investigated by police, the National Audit Office, Financial Ombudsman, the Financial Conduct Authority and any other authority responsible for preventing money laundering and the financing of terrorism
Claimant Sareeta Webra founder of Sikhs Against Sharia (SAS) said, “As a first generation English Sikh I am alarmed at how Islamic discrimination against non-Muslims is defended, condoned and even encouraged, by the British establishment. Sikhism was founded in 1469 specifically to combat violent Muslim oppression and persecution of non-Muslims in the Indian Subcontinent. The bravery of those Sikh founders has been punished with the partition of the Sikh homeland in India. Now it seems the British establishment is sowing the seeds of sharia in England. As a consequence the thistles of social division will spring up and choke the flowers of freedom my parents came to England to savour”.
In over 1000 years of Islamic invasions of India the concept of “Moderate Muslim” was never created because it simply is not true. Islam dictates its followers to put their religion before the defence of the realm within which it resides. That is a fact. If anything, they are better described a “Sharia Muslims” because that is indeed, their PRESCRIPTIVE religion’s true title, and the only one of this type remaining in the world today.”
“David Cameron’s Sukuk Dream Team has seriously overlooked the fact that there are absolutely no provisions for Sharia-Law based fiat-financial instruments found in any legislation or statute. A remarkable move by a desperate cabinet grappling to hide the proceeds of Saudi-Oil Barons’ baksheesh barter; by making the entire general public guilty of the same financial crime?
Moreover, England is a COMMON LAW JURISDICTION where EQUALITY is mandatory, and therefore even if such ridiculous separatist financial products were granted; they would only be allowed if they were available to EVERYONE, including NON-MUSLIMS i.e. Sikhs, Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Atheists, Agnostics, Jedi, etc.
Sharia finance doesn’t just mean interest-free loans. Muslims say it is decreed by allah and it will be Muslim clerics deciding how the money is distributed. We wouldn’t let Christian vicars decide who gets a loan and who doesn’t, so we should not let Muslim clerics discriminate against non-Muslims, as they surely will.”
Stephen Gash, co-founder of top Islamisation Of Europe (SIOE) said, “Obviously, checks and balances are not currently in place to ensure that Muslim charities based in England, in particular, are not siphoning cash to fund terror. Sharia finance does not outlaw the funding of Islamic paramilitary action through compulsory zakat. Indeed, it is clearly mandated in the Koran that Muslims must make war on the infidel who dwell around them (Sura 9:123).
We have recently seen the fruits of Islamic teachings with the muder of Lee Rigby. Those found guilty clearly explained their actions were motivated by Islamic teachings, only for David Cameron to skip out like “Buttons” in a pantomime and say ‘Oh no it isn’t.’ “
Sareeta Webra explained “Elephants are a sacred animal in India, so it pains me to say this, but until British politicians stop skirting around the elephant in the room, namely sharia and Islamic teachings in general, then we can never have a grown-up debate about the place, if any, of Islam in English society. Mosques across the Islamic world teach Muslims that they are superior in every way to non-Muslims. Parliamentarians need to accept that all Islamic teachings are sharia law based, which flagrantly oppose Human Rights legislation confirmed in both EU and English law, so no more mosques must be built in England until English law is made superior to sharia law with all its inherent discrimination.
Sharia Law must be eradicated in its entirety. Anyone wishing to eat meat, marry, work, reproduce etc must do so like the rest of us under the law of their respective country. The Scottish for instance, live under English Law in England, and are not subject to Scottish Law. The same is compulsory for all Muslims. No alien religious laws must be allowed in England.”
Stephen Gash continued, “No Muslim country is signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but each has signed the Cairo Declaration that enshrines sharia law, that in turn ensures the dominance of Muslims over the ‘kuffar.’ This is intolerant attitude is evidenty being taught in mosques in England.
Islam is a problem for Muslims to solve and because they wilfully refuse to solve their problem, Muslims have made themselves a problem for everybody else.”“
Sareeta Webra said, “The English Reformation and foundation of the Church of England started in Cambridge and is celebrated with a plaque on King’s College. Cambridge is the last bastion of Christianity in England and must not fall to Islam, which the construction of the Mill Road mosque clearly intends for Cambridge. I am myself a believer in Jesus Christ the Saviour and have become so without in any way abandoning my Sikhism and love for the Khalsa. Cambridge University has immense respect across the world as an academic institution which is why Cambridge has been targeted as the location for what can only be described as a symbol of Islamic dominance.”
Stephen Gash said, “Cambridge must not become a hub for funding international terrorism by having a triumphalist mosque dumped within it.
Fine words are not enough.
Proper financial accounting must be employed within existing mosques before any more mosques are built in England, including the proposed Mill Road Mosque.”
Sareeta Webra concluded,
“Children born in England, a country renowned for its fairness and equality, ought to be brought up solely subject to English Laws. We must not allow this to be jeopardised by a doctrine that promotes hatred for fellow humans under the guise of a religion. As practicing Sikhs, Hindus & Buddhists originating from India we are not allowed to ignore the law of this land or try to supersede it!
Ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law, something that the proper constabularies of yesteryear enforced very well.”
Some sources for background notes served with the application.