PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ANDERS BEHRING BREVIK ADMITS HE WROTE HIS MANIFESTO IN ORDER TO DESTROY THE COUNTER-JIHAD MOVEMENT
SIOE blames those in the mainstream Western media who wallow in lying, duplicitous, propagandising and self-censorship for all the murders Breivik perpetrated and for all the deaths by violence, in the world. Such people see their role not one of disseminating unexpurgated truth, but one of manipulating public opinion. Innocent people die as a result.
Thankfully, this is not true for all the media, there are still some beacons of honest reporting. SIOE has experienced both the good, but unfortunately, mainly the bad.
With thanks to Robert Spencer Director of Jihad watch and Stop Islamisation Of America (SIOA)
Stop Islamisation Of Europe (SIOE) was founded in 2007 to stop and reverse the replacement of the European democratic system and law-making with Islam and Sharia law.
SIOE’s slogan is “Racism is the lowest form of stupidity; Islamophobia is the height of common sense.”
In an open letter to the media Anders Behring Breivik says that he used “counter-jihadist” rhetoric in the manifesto to protect “ethno-nationalists” and instead provoke a media campaign against the anti-nationalist counter-jihad supporters. He calls this a strategy of “dual psychology.”
Eighteen months before he committed his act of mass murder against innocent youngsters on Norway’s island of Utøya and other innocents in Oslo on 22 July 2011, SIOE rejected Breivik’s attempts to join SIOE’s Facebook group. Organisers were aware of Breivik’s Nazi sympathies.
SIOE organisers are convinced that Breivik committed his mass murder to specifically destroy SIOE due to SIOE’s overtly expressed anti-Nazism and anti-racism, and also for rejecting his advances to join SIOE. SIOE believes that his manifesto was written and his act of mass murder perpetrated to directly and uniquely target SIOE in order to eliminate its active presence in Europe.
Anders Breivik has now openly confessed as much.
In its many protests against encroaching Sharia and Islamic practices, SIOE has stated that any display of Nazi, communist and Islamic symbols would not be tolerated. On the single occasion when Nazis sneakily infiltrated one demonstration those Nazis were forcibly ejected from the protest, with police approval.
Each one of SIOE’s demonstrations has been peaceful, and fully approved by law enforcement authorities. Even when SIOE’s inaugural and eponymous demonstration on 11 September 2007 in Brussels was banned by Mayor Thielemanns, SIOE was permitted to hand in a 20,000 signature ‘Stop Islamisation’ petition to the EU Parliament, hold a conference and also to commemorate the 9/11 victims of Muslim terrorism.
SIOE’s refusal to permit Nazis made it popular with the public.
However, SIOE received open hostility from politicians such as British MP John Denham, who likened SIOE to Moseley’s fascists, despite our repeated, and truthful, anti-fascist assertions. The only violence displayed at any SIOE demonstration was from opposition groups such as Muslims, Unite Against Fascism and Antifa.
Breivik’s confession has now made our opponents look not only ridiculous, but also untruthful in their claims that Breivik was inspired by SIOE.
Most of the media were unhelpful because they distorted the facts, for example claiming Breivik was “an extreme Christian fundamentalist” even though he stated he was not even a practising Christian. Most of the media either censored or distorted SIOE’s ripostes and rebuffs of claims made in the same media, that Breivik had associations with, and was inspired by, SIOE. Breivik’s own confession proves that SIOE was telling the truth and our accusers in the media were lying.
So, Breivik was neither a SIOE supporter nor a practising Christian.
However, he was indisputably a Freemason. This makes him infinitely closer to senior police officers, senior military, gangsters, journalists and even Royalty, than he ever was to SIOE. Breivik maybe even shared a Masonic lodge with Norwegian Royalty and senior police officers.
Breivik allegedly visited the United Kingdom and was mentored by someone he called “Richard the Lionheart”. For all we know this man could have been the Duke of Edinburgh, the Queen’s husband, or Britain’s most senior Freemason, the Duke of Kent, cousin to the Queen. True, this is highly improbable, but no more absurd than Breivik being inspired by SIOE.
In fact Breivik was so uninspired by SIOE he uniquely tried to destroy SIOE.
Breivik also professed membership of the Order of the Venerable Order of St. John which, if true, again brings him into contact with Royalty because Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II is at the apex of the Order.
Maybe Freemasons and the Venerable Order of St John should be as scrupulous as SIOE in vetting its potential members so as to more protect its high profile members?
Interestingly, Nelson Mandela, now revered as a demigod, was also convicted for offences concerned with violence directed at his own government. Mandela was also a Freemason and member of the Venerable Order of St John. We can only wait to see if Breivik eventually comes to be as honoured and revered as Nelson Mandela. Both, it seems, were motivated by race, something SIOE evidentially is not.
SIOE is in no doubt that Freemasons and the Venerable Order of St John are as dismayed and angered at being associated with Anders Breivik as SIOE was, and still is, with the smearing of it by some unscrupulous parts of the Western mainstream media.
SIOE is delighted at being exonerated at last.